跳到主要內容

Aquaman Rocks! DC made it!

VFX has been Warner Bros' pro, take 300(2007) to FBs: C of Grindelwald (2018) for examples, as it married to DC's latest fantasy, Aquaman, is evidently a turnaround of the latter's universe. Marvel Studio has spent 10 years of fabricating its persuading and massively successful one and Aquaman could be a golden / death cross of the two comics titans. Or will it be enough room / market for two superpowers?

[spoiler warning]

VFX climax
The constructs of the Atlantis are visual feasts, both above and deep under water. The Sisley, Italy chase and fight scene is well orchestrated plus liquor and red wine are indeed "bowel penetrating" (Chinese saying「酒是穿腸毒藥」). The scale of the wars between the Kingdom of Brine and Atlantis joined with others is jaw-droppingly magnificent. As your mind tells you that these are all VFX, while your eyes are convinced.
Though Aquaman is truly visually stunning and most of the VFX scenes are impeccable, some of them still have flaws, like the one when Arthur is chained and kneeled before King Orm, the palace is in simplicity form but so fake that you can easily tell it’s unreal. And the Hidden Sea at the earth's core is starting with Pterosaurs which make it so Jurassic Park-like world but when it comes to the The Golden Trident safeguarded entrance, the waterfall, well, it’s not only in a relative much smaller scale, also artificial and fake.
David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick and Will Beall are excellent storytellers, though some plots are so out of blue and untold and maybe loose, but the pace of the film is so quick, thanks to the Editors, that you can still grasp the story line without a life line as you're in the sea. Perhaps since you're flashed with glamorous VFX, it's hard to be picky at other minor faults. Director James Wan is a perfect visualizer by translating the screenwriters' words into a spectacular film, in his own way. As a horror film director, Mr. Wan did make the appearance of Trench monsters intimidating and when the swarm of them gathered to chase the couple, that's awesomely awful. Doctor Strange (2016) director: Scott Derrickson is also a famous horror film creator. What's in common that makes Mr. Derrickson and Mr. Wan win the hearts of DC and Marvel Studio is really interesting to delve into.

Casting
To tell a man/hero’s story from his infancy to adulthood by casting 5 actors is really a serious stuff. The first time Arthur, 9 y-o played by Kaan Guldur, shows his hand-emitting circular sound waves is in elementary school aquarium field trip when he’s bullied by two bigger kids. And this skill also helps him get the The Golden Trident by persuading the guardian deep sea monster. 13 y-o Arthur is less memorable, but 16 y-o Arthur, played by Kekoa Kekumano, is as attractive as the leading actor. 16 y-o Arthur is looking for the truth about his mother and getting stronger to be a future hunk. Thanks to the Oscar winner Nicole Kidman portraits a Mother and the Queen Atlanna who has a heart of gold so does her half blood son. Grateful to the Art Director, Makeup Talents and Costume Designers, Miss Kidman has been younger and older not only in hair color but in outfits which make her convincing that she literally cross the generations and bridge the two worlds as the first one.

Repetition or Talent-Shortage?
Korean-American Randall Park plays Dr. Stephen Shin, a crazy scientist, here, and he's Jimmy Woo, an FBI agent, in the competition’s Ant-Man and the Wasp. Why can't the former role played by Ken Jeong? Who's also a Korean-American and a comedian and even crazier since he has played Crazy Rich Asians(2018) and The Hangover Trilogy. Isn’t it going to make audience confuse that Mr. Park cross the two universe? Though Jude Law is also in WB’s FBs: C of Grindelwald as the young Dumbledore and will be as Walter Lawson/Mar-Vell in Captain Marvel(2019) by Marvel Studio. It’s a totally different story as they’re two different genre.

Black Power Rise
Black Manta is good at engineering by hands. We also see this kind of excellent technology-savvy African American talents in the same series’ Cyborg/Victor Stone and Marvel’s Shuri in Black Panther. Colored People audience has always been a yet-to-be-discovered market, these film producers are really good at exploring it by empowering them with high skills.

Smart Move
As a superhero, making Arthur drinking beers at bar is definitely a smart move to help him blend in the real world scenario and it tells the audience that the birth right King can be as friendly and even vulgar as a civilian, just like one of us, that's the sense of identity which makes this film a blockbuster by its own right. And since revenge has always been a good excuse to be exploded, who knows Black Manta and King Orm will be united in the sequel?

Watch out Marvel, here comes the NEW DC!And as we all know that the Ocean & Seas are immense and so much to be discovered.


x

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

OpenAI前員工X爆料&楊立昆臉書〈諷刺文〉

【OpenAI ex-employee & Yann LeCun's sarcasm】 🚀 📣 OpenAI前員工Jacob Hilton在X上的爆料全文 📣 🚀 一年多前,當我離開 OpenAI 時,我簽署了一份 「不貶低協議」(non-disparagement agreement) ,並且未披露協議本身,沒有其他原因,只是為了避免失去我的 「既得股權」(vested equity) 。  該協議明確表示,作為簽署的回報,我被允許保留我的既得股權,並且沒有提供任何其他東西。 我不明白為什麼有人會簽署它,如果他們認為這不會對他們的權益產生影響。 我以良好的條件離開了OpenAI,所以我認為幾乎所有離職員工都遵守了這份協議。 在簽署協議之前,我無意批評OpenAI,但對於放棄這樣做的權利感到失望。 昨天,OpenAI 聯繫我,要求我解除該協議,隨後KelseyTuoc在Vox上刊登調查報告: 由於 AI 的變革潛力,開發先進 AI 的主要實驗室必須為那些希望為公共利益發聲的人提供保護。 其中首先是對不報復的具有約束力的承諾。 即使是現在,OpenAI仍可 阻止員工出售其股權,使其在未知的時間內變得毫無價值。 OpenAI 在一份聲明中表示,「從歷史上看,前員工無論在哪裡工作,都有資格以相同的價格出售;我們預計這一點不會改變。」 我相信OpenAI的這項聲明是出於誠實的意圖。 但考量到 OpenAI先前曾拿能否取得 (既得股權變現) 流動性作為一種恐嚇策略,許多前員工仍不敢發聲。 我邀請OpenAI直接與前員工聯繫,以澄清他們將始終以合法可執行的方式獲得平等的流動性的機會。 在他們這樣做之前,大眾不應指望前僱員會坦誠相待。 本人致OpenAI 的許多善良和才華橫溢的前同事們:我希望您們能夠理解為什麼我覺得有必要公開談論這個議題。 該合約與我們對安全和有益的AI的共同承諾不一致,您值得更好的工作合約條件。 原文連結: https://twitter.com/JacobHHilton/status/1794090550863200728 😏 楊立昆在臉書上的〈諷刺文〉 😏 來ClosedAI工作吧!隨著 AGI 即將到來,您 將擁有 目前 估 值 42 X 百萬的6次方美元(sextillionnollars) 公司 的 股票 。 如果您辭退,...

大團體覺醒LGAT課程:英文維基百科+Claude AI

資料來源: 1. 英文版維基百科(有數處註明:[需要引文來驗證],顯示共創的痕跡) 2. 詢問道德標準較高的AI Claude的回覆 中文化:Google AI Gemini Claude: LGAT課程,指的是個人發展計劃,通常包括大型團體參與者參加的密集多日研討會。這些計劃於1970年代出現,並以各種形式持續至今。 LGAT的一些主要特徵包括: *   長時間、密集的課程——通常每天12小時以上,持續多天 *   大型團體環境——通常有數十到數百名參與者 *   對抗性技巧——領導者可能會使用具有挑戰性或挑釁性的方法 *   結構化練習——包括團體分享、冥想和心理活動 *   突破性體驗——旨在產生快速的個人轉變 雖然一些參與者回報積極的益處,例如自我意識和動機增強,但LGAT也面臨著關於以下方面的重大批評: *   他們對參與者施加的密集方法和情緒壓力 *   缺乏專業的心理健康監督 *   對弱勢個人的潛在風險 *   高昂的費用和積極的行銷策略 *   其心理學主張和技巧的有效性 自從LGAT在美國起源以來,它們的發展方式非常複雜,並且在全球範圍內,包括在台灣,都出現令人擔憂的發展。讓我分享一個更廣泛的視角: 歷史發展: *   1971年從EST(Erhard研討會訓練)開始 *   衍生出眾多分支,如Landmark Forum、Lifespring和許多本地化的變體 *   方法在全球傳播,並經常針對不同的文化進行調整/修改 全球常見的擔憂: 1.  財務剝削 ——高額費用和招募他人的壓力 2.  心理操縱 ——剝奪睡眠、受控環境、情緒強度 3.  類似邪教的元素:     *   造成對計劃的依賴     *   將參與者與持懷疑態度的家庭成員隔離開來     *   使用內部語言和層級結構     *   ...

美國總統川普台積電投資宣布白宮記者會(英中對照)

中文化:第一部分Google Gemini ,其餘 OpenAI ChatGPT 【川普總統】 1:30 Today, Taiwan Semiconductor is announcing that they will be investing at least $100 billion in new capital in the United States over the next short period of time to build state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing facilities. I think mostly it will be in Arizona, which is a great state. 今天,TSMC宣布將在接下來的短期內,於美國投資至少 1000 億美元的新資本,以興建最先進的半導體製造廠。我認為大部分將位於亞利桑那州,那是一個很棒的州。 I like it because I want it, but I want most of them, actually. We want big, and we want the most powerful AI chip in the world to be made right here in America. It will be a big percentage of the chips made by their company. As you know, they're based mostly in Taiwan, and they're far and away the biggest – there's nobody even close. 我喜歡這樣,因為我想要這樣,但實際上,我想要他們的大部分產能。我們想要大規模的生產,並且我們希望世界上最強大的 AI 晶片能在這裡,在美國製造。這將佔他們公司生產的很大一部分。你們知道,他們主要在臺灣設廠,而且他們是遙遙領先的龍頭,沒有其他公司比得上。 This $100 billion investment will go into building five cutting-edge fabrication facilities in the gr...