跳到主要內容

How MCU Lost Its "Soul" & "Heart" ?

This is not an endgame, it has so many factors to be a Captain America sequel, as Rogers acts acts in such a personal way after finishing his final mission. And the music is quintessentially American, sounds like country and 70s, 80s, sort of the music curated for Peter Quill. No better music options then we've made do with those, or maybe they don't want to shave any glitter from the marvelous VFX. 

The main theme shows that "Sacrifice is the key, betrayal is also crucial." "History might be undone, and humanity can be deliberately manipulated. " Though the key tone is quite heavy and melancholy plus the once humorous guy became a joke, thanks to Scott Lang who doesn't care to be called a clumsy idiot and shamelessly asked for a photo-op and so on, he brings this film a nimble touch of fun.

Male bodies are sexually materialized now: Melting ice cream vs. American ass/butt. Featured God acts more like human as suffered a crushing/humiliating defeat. Downfall does not discriminate, it prevails to all, including God who doesn't stick to a God's iron will or maybe even faithless. 

You can see the commoners' connections when Clint Barton's daughter is inherited as a great archer. He also acquired a new skill : ninja, the Japanese factor is a balanced match with the South Korean one in Ultron. It makes us believe that superheros don't necessary have superpowers. And Steve Rogers proves to us that how a scientific experiment success evolved with integrity eventually even God's moved by him. 

Contemporary reference makes audience feel that the made-up universe is close to them but it's two edges of the sword. Commercial installment is a good example, this time it's a German automaker and the model doesn't impress me at all apart from its engine sound. Though while the characters play PUBG or Fortnite kind of game, it definitely makes many guys wow and ha-ha.

Time travel/heist is confusing or at least hard to understand since Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely create their own version of theory and overturn all the previous time travel movies, mostly "Back to the Future" and "Somewhere in Time" is a collateral damage, which we have been educated how the time thing works, via James Rhodes/War Machine's mouth. The storytelling has a good opening, but it deteriorates along with the time stuff, and gratefully some key character shows up and clarify it with the golden time flow.

More about the time thing : 
How come Peter Parker still goes to the same high school, and supposedly the same grade, after 5 years? A stark contrast is that Scott Lang's once little girl is already a big teenager after 5 years.

Fighting him/herself scenes are exciting but it bluntly violate the rules said by the characters. So what is the time theory invented by Markus and McFeely after all? Whatever they want to be?

The Russo brothers are genius in directing epic war scenes, while the sentimental parts are also heart-warmingly good, especially the American style family value still plays an important part in this 22nd sequel : mother and son, fathers and daughters. father and son.

With all due respect, the final mega-scale confrontation is merely an upgrade of all the previous films and combo, and the consequence is that fights are at blink fast pace with the messy scene, it's exhilarating but vision-consuming. Not sure whether it's a formula or what, the good side is on the screen left side, and the evil side is on the right. Infinity War has that visual-angle already, so it's not that surprisingly marvelous at all.

The new face Carol Danvers/Captain Marvel (Actually, she hasn't been called this title in both films) just came out of blue twice and save the main characters/stuff. What an awkward appearance in terms of all the others have deep-rooted in fans' minds. 

Is this an endgame? Only for sure is that Avengers' state-of-the-art base followed the destiny of Tony Stark's seaside cliff-hang mansion. Sadly to accept that the characters' sacrifice is a harsh reminder that you got to have SOUL and HEART.
What's on Marvel Studio president Mr. Kevin Feige's mind is totally beyond a low-end like me, but what on earth could a brainy has a perfect marriage with massive muscle, when you take away the reckless wildness from Hulk, is he still THE Hulk? And why should a shield has to be paired with a weapon. Is it a reflection that the leaders want all the good stuff at once and want to be the winners take all? Will audience be convinced while being fed with all these wild combination and imagination made up by the studio? I don't feel like buying it.

Unlike the new baby girl who used to love her dad 3,000, I won't love MCU 3,000.

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

OpenAI前員工X爆料&楊立昆臉書〈諷刺文〉

【OpenAI ex-employee & Yann LeCun's sarcasm】 🚀 📣 OpenAI前員工Jacob Hilton在X上的爆料全文 📣 🚀 一年多前,當我離開 OpenAI 時,我簽署了一份 「不貶低協議」(non-disparagement agreement) ,並且未披露協議本身,沒有其他原因,只是為了避免失去我的 「既得股權」(vested equity) 。  該協議明確表示,作為簽署的回報,我被允許保留我的既得股權,並且沒有提供任何其他東西。 我不明白為什麼有人會簽署它,如果他們認為這不會對他們的權益產生影響。 我以良好的條件離開了OpenAI,所以我認為幾乎所有離職員工都遵守了這份協議。 在簽署協議之前,我無意批評OpenAI,但對於放棄這樣做的權利感到失望。 昨天,OpenAI 聯繫我,要求我解除該協議,隨後KelseyTuoc在Vox上刊登調查報告: 由於 AI 的變革潛力,開發先進 AI 的主要實驗室必須為那些希望為公共利益發聲的人提供保護。 其中首先是對不報復的具有約束力的承諾。 即使是現在,OpenAI仍可 阻止員工出售其股權,使其在未知的時間內變得毫無價值。 OpenAI 在一份聲明中表示,「從歷史上看,前員工無論在哪裡工作,都有資格以相同的價格出售;我們預計這一點不會改變。」 我相信OpenAI的這項聲明是出於誠實的意圖。 但考量到 OpenAI先前曾拿能否取得 (既得股權變現) 流動性作為一種恐嚇策略,許多前員工仍不敢發聲。 我邀請OpenAI直接與前員工聯繫,以澄清他們將始終以合法可執行的方式獲得平等的流動性的機會。 在他們這樣做之前,大眾不應指望前僱員會坦誠相待。 本人致OpenAI 的許多善良和才華橫溢的前同事們:我希望您們能夠理解為什麼我覺得有必要公開談論這個議題。 該合約與我們對安全和有益的AI的共同承諾不一致,您值得更好的工作合約條件。 原文連結: https://twitter.com/JacobHHilton/status/1794090550863200728 😏 楊立昆在臉書上的〈諷刺文〉 😏 來ClosedAI工作吧!隨著 AGI 即將到來,您 將擁有 目前 估 值 42 X 百萬的6次方美元(sextillionnollars) 公司 的 股票 。 如果您辭退,...

京晨科技 NUUO

2015年01月30日 京晨科公告營運長異動 :營運長施錦昌退休 鼎新電腦 官網資料:特助施錦昌提到:「以前未使用ERP系統時,需不斷手動調整資訊,不但人工成本高,錯誤率也高,讓人很難信任報表資料。所以之前在進行一些重大決策時,常常會有擔憂決策錯誤的壓力。但自導入ERP再加EasyFlow之後,此類問題改良許多。」 以下摘編自:《遠見雜誌》2013年2月號/臺大創聯會 (NTUEA)2013年12月25日臉書/《工商時報》2015年01月05日 【京晨科技NUUO Leaders】 董事長 楊文彬 :台大大氣系,高職念五年、大學念七年畢業,暱稱Killer(殺手) 總經理 黃建峯 (暱稱卡通)、研發副總 黃建山 (暱稱卡弟,意指卡通的弟弟),台大資工系友兄弟檔兩人求學時序:附中、台大、研究所。 曾創業失敗 念大三時,BBCall和黑金剛手機剛竄紅,楊文彬早上在大氣系打工當助理,閒暇時就跑去賣手機,很快就開通訊行,第一個月大賺40萬,短短半年開了五家店,人家喚他「少年楊董」,叱吒一時。但 成功來的太快 ,讓他 志得意滿,到處遊山玩水 ,直到警覺不對,財務已出現漏洞, 被倒帳幾百萬 。「我那時真的非常落魄,出現人生中第一根白髮,還得兼好幾份工、送報還債,但失敗經驗讓我學到 管理 及 財務 的重要,」楊文彬說。 安控門外漢 找到市場利基 2001年楊文彬拿出30萬與好朋友們創業,就是希望 用自己喜歡的方式 燃燒熱情 ,其間創立電腦設計、安控軟體、影像處理、遊戲、網通技術等五家公司。其中最成功的京晨科技 (NUUO Inc.),利用B2B行銷全球安全監控的高端市場。從創業的第一天起,京晨就非常務實。切入少有頂尖人才想做、卻又年年成長的監控安防產業,加上不閉門造車、積極聆聽市場聲音,這些都是成功的主要原因。     楊文彬是 業務 出身,創業時的第一個想法是要先從產業著手,只要找到對的產業,你才有在裡面的生存空間,就好比釣魚一樣,要釣到魚,前提是那個池塘裡,要有夠多的魚。等到決定市場了,接下來的問題,才是要推出什麼產品,用什麼方式、什麼技術,去做產品,甚至開拓市場。就在這個思考邏輯下,當時的三人小組,在密集開會後,得到一個結論,就是京晨科需要的是 高成長、高毛利 ,但不要太大的產業。要高毛利、高成長,是考量到當時的京...

楊立昆以自身經歷談H1-B

美大選期間在X上和馬斯克大唱反調後,Meta首席AI科學家楊立昆(Yann LeCun )氣得公告「我不再在X上寫貼文。只轉發其他平台的連結、留言朋友的推文」,所以他在自家公司平台上只對馬斯克在X上的截圖,留言區討論串就文明多了。 https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19Xy7kURLq/ 以下是楊立昆在臉書上的貼文和精選交流: 看到圍繞 H1-B 簽證議題的 MAGA 陣營陷入混亂很有趣。   在美國,持有 STEM 博士學位的人中,超過 50% 並非生於美國。   美國大學 STEM 領域的教授中,比例更高的大多數也並非生於美國。   在美國頂尖大學工程領域(包括電腦科學)的博士生中,絕大多數是非美國出生的學生。   美國科技公司中,大量的創辦人、CEO、高階管理層也並非生於美國。其中包括:   - Satya Nadella(微軟)  - Sergey Brin(Google)- Jensen Huang(輝達)   - Sundar Pichai(Alphabet)  - Elon Musk  - Hock Tan(博通)   - Vinod Khosla(Sun、Khosla Ventures)   許多人是以學生簽證來到美國,並且大多在某個階段持有過 H1-B 工作簽證。我最初是持 J-1 簽證來美國(原本沒打算待超過兩年),後來轉為 H1-B,拿到綠卡,最後成為美國公民。 ▷▷▷▷▷▷ Alyosha Efros:民主黨在這個議題上完全讓步給了共和黨,甚是可惜。他們只關注非法移民問題,結果疏遠了數百萬合法移民,這些人苦於應對荒謬的美國移民程序。   如果民主黨在這個問題上主導局勢,也許馬斯克和其他科技巨頭就不會把靈魂賣給川普了……   Yann LeCun:幾個原因導致矽谷一些有影響力的人物選擇站在 MAGA 一邊:   1. AI 和加密貨幣的監管障礙威脅   2. 「未實現收益稅」的恐慌   3. 對 H1-B 改革的冷淡支持...